HomeBlogN.Y. Times features Seattle Children's Lean transformation

N.Y. Times features Seattle Children's Lean transformation

The following article showcases the excellent results Seattle Childrens has achieved using the lean methodology

There is an interesting comment from a nursing union representative in Minneapolis who recently went on strike. She claims that lean reduced nursing patient ratios. In the article she offers no data in support  this comment. In fact, our experience has been that staff to patient ratios actually increase in a successful lean implementation because the staff are no longer doing non value added work which puts them back at the bedside instead of filling out forms or running around looking for supplies. The experience in manufacturing has been mostly positive as well and unions who are actively involved with their members on the shop floor are generally quite supportive of lean activities because it is the union members who actually suggest and make the changes to the process not management.


This certainly is true in healthcare as well.Having visited 64 sites in nine countries that are in some stages of lean implementation and having spoken to hundreds of doctors and nurses who are involved their message to me is almost always the same, "Why didn't we do this sooner? I would never go back to how we did things before". But the problem as Mark Graban points out is that poor implementation of lean can lead to a failed lean initiative which can leave staff discouraged and cynical. Before deciding to do what Seattle Children's didleaders must do their homework. There are many resources now available to organizations that weren't there when Seattle Children's started this years ago.I recommend checking out www.hcvl.org as the first step. 


Here's the article: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/business/11seattle.html?_r=1&emc=eta1 


John S. Toussaint

John S. Toussaint, MD
President and CEO, ThedaCare Center for Healthcare Value,
(920) 831-1961


Related Documents


Comments:

I've tried engaging with the MN nurses union online, via their YouTube video and their blog. It's a waste of time, unfortunately.

They don't want to talk about the substance of lean, they are more interested in smearing "big business" as "greedy" and they're obsessed with the paychecks of hospital CEOs.

They clearly have an axe to grind.

That said, they are correct (from their accusation in the NY Times article) that consultants shouldn't be stopwatching nurses, telling them what to do, pressuring them to hit standard times for patient care. That seems like lean done badly...

My blog post about the article:

http://www.leanblog.org/2010/07/lean-healthcare-featured-in-sunday-ny-times-business-page/
by Mark Graban at 10:05am on July 11, 2010
"...consultants shouldn't be stopwatching nurses, telling them what to do, pressuring them to hit standard times for patient care."
___

The entire point of Lean is the taking of "ownership" by the people DOING the work. At the risk of analogy MEGO, coaches don't win ball games, the players do.
by BobbyG at 11:08am on July 12, 2010
Interesting article. I circulated it to my REC team.

I find the choice of phrase “factory floor methods” a bit of a Straw Man pejorative, a simplistic implicit dismissal of the applicability of Lean concepts to service work environments that are in fact complex and highly variable, wherein sequential and parallel process are indeed nowhere near as tightly coupled and predictable as they are in manufacturing.

I typically favor two analogies when trying to sell the idea, both of which I am intimately familiar with – basketball and jazz (at the risk of losing people for whom neither hold any interest).

Both basketball (and, you could cite other team sports) and jazz have “teams/ensembles,” “rules,” (“processes”) and “roles” (I am a 2 Guard at hoops, mostly a support player, and mostly a rhythm guitarist onstage), but the inherent situational variability comprising their respective “flows” require that all members “take ownership” of being adept at improvising effectively when necessary in pursuit of winning a game or making “coherent” music on the fly. Such requires hard-won skills, including the skills of “court awareness” or “ears” that are always attuned to the circumstances at hand (points I think address the beg-offs of the nurse cited in the article).

Coaches/consultants don’t win ball games, team players do. Critics don’t make fine music, skilled musicians do.

Clinical team members will do “Lean.”

Or they won’t. We certainly won’t do it for them.
by BobbyG at 5:08pm on July 12, 2010

Post Comment: